<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How not to walk out of your Oscar party in disgust</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/8895/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/8895</link>
	<description>The daily organ of the Northeast Corridor Social Club</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 04:32:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/8895#comment-63364</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 16:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greatwhatsit.com/?p=8895#comment-63364</guid>
		<description>Post-Singularity and post-capitalism, I will not be fretting about the Oscars one bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Post-Singularity and post-capitalism, I will not be fretting about the Oscars one bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marleyfan</title>
		<link>http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/8895#comment-63361</link>
		<dc:creator>Marleyfan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 14:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greatwhatsit.com/?p=8895#comment-63361</guid>
		<description>Maury D,
You don&#039;t have the ONP yet (Optical Nerve Projection)?
Got it last year- highly recommended.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maury D,<br />
You don&#8217;t have the ONP yet (Optical Nerve Projection)?<br />
Got it last year- highly recommended.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maury D</title>
		<link>http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/8895#comment-63360</link>
		<dc:creator>Maury D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 22:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greatwhatsit.com/?p=8895#comment-63360</guid>
		<description>(um except not DVD because by then presumably you will think of a film and it will be projected directly through your optical nerves.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(um except not DVD because by then presumably you will think of a film and it will be projected directly through your optical nerves.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maury D</title>
		<link>http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/8895#comment-63359</link>
		<dc:creator>Maury D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 22:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greatwhatsit.com/?p=8895#comment-63359</guid>
		<description>Take some consolation imagining the satisfaction some kid will get, fifty years hence, discovering oh let&#039;s say (500) Days of Summer* on DVD and saying to his friends in the dorm &quot;Avatar was the commercial success, and it got the Oscar, but they were actually making good movies back then, even if practically nobody saw them so it wasn&#039;t profitable to give them awards.&quot;  And then they&#039;ll pass the joint and laugh about the idea of  &quot;commercial success&quot; because capitalism will be dead.  Hey, this is &lt;i&gt;my&lt;/i&gt; little story.  I can do what I want in it.  Anyway my point, such as it is, is that I think we worry about these awards not because they mean anything now, but because they may shape the canon and deprive future geeks and aesthetes of what&#039;s good.  But it won&#039;t.  They&#039;ll dig.

*Not the very best example, troubled if nothing else by the awful trope of the sassy younger sibling who knows the score, but it&#039;s the only new movie I saw this year so I&#039;m helpless to come up with better.  Anyway it had its charms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take some consolation imagining the satisfaction some kid will get, fifty years hence, discovering oh let&#8217;s say (500) Days of Summer* on DVD and saying to his friends in the dorm &#8220;Avatar was the commercial success, and it got the Oscar, but they were actually making good movies back then, even if practically nobody saw them so it wasn&#8217;t profitable to give them awards.&#8221;  And then they&#8217;ll pass the joint and laugh about the idea of  &#8220;commercial success&#8221; because capitalism will be dead.  Hey, this is <i>my</i> little story.  I can do what I want in it.  Anyway my point, such as it is, is that I think we worry about these awards not because they mean anything now, but because they may shape the canon and deprive future geeks and aesthetes of what&#8217;s good.  But it won&#8217;t.  They&#8217;ll dig.</p>
<p>*Not the very best example, troubled if nothing else by the awful trope of the sassy younger sibling who knows the score, but it&#8217;s the only new movie I saw this year so I&#8217;m helpless to come up with better.  Anyway it had its charms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeremy</title>
		<link>http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/8895#comment-63358</link>
		<dc:creator>jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 22:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greatwhatsit.com/?p=8895#comment-63358</guid>
		<description>The thing that surprises me about this post, Dave, is that your &quot;new policy&quot; is to keep things in perspective. Since you&#039;re so rationally cynical about so many different things, I&#039;m kind of shocked that you hadn&#039;t dismissed the Oscars a long, long time ago... I like the Oscars, but I can&#039;t remember ever thinking that the best films, or the best performances, were consistently rewarded. Even the supposedly &quot;Independent&quot; movies that the Academy is so worried about dominating the Oscars (hence the need to expand the field to 10) usually seem pretty mainstream to me. 

And, ftr, I agree about most of the films you mentioned (though I liked American Beauty quite a lot), especially Crash, which was a complete cartoon. But isn&#039;t it kind of fun to be incredulous every now and then, especially about something that doesn&#039;t really matter so much?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing that surprises me about this post, Dave, is that your &#8220;new policy&#8221; is to keep things in perspective. Since you&#8217;re so rationally cynical about so many different things, I&#8217;m kind of shocked that you hadn&#8217;t dismissed the Oscars a long, long time ago&#8230; I like the Oscars, but I can&#8217;t remember ever thinking that the best films, or the best performances, were consistently rewarded. Even the supposedly &#8220;Independent&#8221; movies that the Academy is so worried about dominating the Oscars (hence the need to expand the field to 10) usually seem pretty mainstream to me. </p>
<p>And, ftr, I agree about most of the films you mentioned (though I liked American Beauty quite a lot), especially Crash, which was a complete cartoon. But isn&#8217;t it kind of fun to be incredulous every now and then, especially about something that doesn&#8217;t really matter so much?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.113 seconds -->

