Definitely Not Safe For Work!

.
.
.
.
.
.
Came across this article on Monday.
.
.
.
.
.
.
P1000499

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

It just seemed like it deserved this:
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

P1000501
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Hmmm, or this:
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
P1000502

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

Or?
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
P1000503

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

Then this today:
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
P1000505
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Had to try again:
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

P1000504
.
.
.
.
.
.

Can't wait to see what the coming days bring.

.

writing service

.
.

.

.

zp8497586rq

36 responses to “Definitely Not Safe For Work!”

  1. lol! The continually evolving Whatsit. Poor Jimmy Fallon.

  2. lane says:

    “what the coming days bring . . .”

  3. ScottyGee says:

    The arch of Jimmy’s feet is superbly executed in drawing-2. Art school?

    And Leno’s trampstamp is priceless!

  4. Andrew says:

    I like the accuracy of including the frowny-face birthmark on Jimmy Fallon’s penis.

  5. wet blanket says:

    Welcome to the Great Whatsit, 8th-grade-boys edition. Sorry, Literacy, not a fan of this post.

  6. This would be one of those posts that would be a lot more fun if TGW was more like a message board, so we could all join in and share our “masterpieces.”

  7. ScottyGee says:

    “Great Whatsit, 8th-grade-boys edition.” Why not? We’ve had a lot of other incarnations.

  8. Rachel says:

    So, is Jeff Koons going to be a regular contributor now, or what?

  9. Literacy's Mom says:

    Oh, honey, whydja hafta do this to the Dogfight name?

  10. Jeff Koons says:

    I dunno. I was going to, but some of the art on this site is a little too banal, even for me. I like puppies and bunnies.

  11. lane says:

    so is this worse than that gore picture i put up? people hated this. which was worse?

  12. lane says:

    this is bad on a lot of levels. that gore picture seemed, pretty 8th grade, sure, but i don’t know some how this seems tackier.

  13. lane says:

    i mean, i took responsibillity for the gore pic.

    i move to have this stricken from the record . . .

    no questions asked.

  14. Tim says:

    While I’m not a fan of this post, I think it’s a bad idea to strike it from the record. Only the author of a post should be empowered to take it down. Pressure to do so should be applied very sparingly, only in cases of revelation of a pseudonymous Whatsitter’s real name or of insult to a specfic person or persons. Well, that’s my take, anyway.

  15. farrell fawcett says:

    Hey Literacy,

    You’re depraved, but I still love you. And why isn’t Jeff Zucker in that picture? And is that Jimmy Fallon’s cock ring? We need answers!

  16. I think the cartoons are funny, and the idea of rewriting the front page with a pack of PostIts and a Sharpie has legs… might be the best reason I’ve seen for subscribing to a printed newspaper.

  17. tipper gore says:

    oh god that’s rich.
    the artist, the one that thrives on controversy, advocating for censorship of a cartoon on a blog that no-one cares about anyway?? (according to him).
    it’s so good. you can’t make up this kind of shit.

  18. Literacy H Dogfight says:

    Thank you for all your kind words. Especially Scott, Rogan, and Andrew. I’m impressed by your keenly developed perceptive gaze. I thought someone would just mistake the tramp stamp for back hair. Nice work. And yes, that is Jimmy’s cock ring in free-fall.

    As to Jeff Zucker, well, he absolutely deserves a place in this sandwich. Unfortunately the Times sabatoged my attempts at the highest level of Satire (skewering those in power) by not including a photo of Zucker in the front page line-up. But aren’t we used to the Times’ routine distortion of the news in the service of the Elites (re: Zucker). They may have protected him this time, but his time will come. Believe me. If my ugly pen has anything to do with it.

  19. Peter Schjeldahl says:

    Ah, now I get the cock ring, but that still looks like back hair to me.

  20. lane says:

    hey 20 comments . . . nice . . .

  21. Roberta Smith says:

    What really brought it home for me were Jimmy Fallon’s jazz hands. Brilliant!

  22. lane says:

    Ken Johnson is usually the “dicks” critic . . .

    Scheldahl tends to be too poetic, a little shy perhaps. and Roberta, well . . . no, she’d never . . .

  23. Jarry Saltz says:

    Oh, baby, this piece succeeds, but not because of “skill”. It’s about de-skilling, right? You know it, baby.

  24. lane says:

    god this is great! the whole fuckin’ art world! this IS as good as FB!

  25. Michael Kimmelman says:

    Look, you think your kid could paint that? No way did some kid do that.

  26. Simon Cowell says:

    Rubbish. If this were a talent competition, you’d be out on your arse.

  27. Grandma Moses says:

    Oh, my lord. I think I’m going to have a heart attack!

  28. O.B.L. says:

    Death to America!

  29. Jeremy says:

    whoa. i’ve been missing out today…. i’m sorry, but this made me laugh and laugh and laugh. i guess that makes me the target 8th-grade-boy demographic…

  30. Dave says:

    Okay, so I’m gonna teach you guys a little trick with the sockpuppetting, It’s kinda funny, but it’s also kinda lame if we really don’t know who’s making the comments. Bad form. So when you make a sockpuppet comment, include a url that will identify you, like maybe your TGW author’s page, if you’re an author here (something like http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/author/dave), or maybe a link to your own blog, or even something like http://www.robertasmithisreallysoandso.info. So you get the joke of the sockpuppet, plus you get credit, plus you uphold the niceties of etiquette, which, as Miss Manners correctly points out, is merely meant to help us all get along.

    This obviously doesn’t apply to posting as Literacy or otherwise posting when you have a good reason to want to be pseudonymous. (It is completely understandable why nobody wants to fess up to having drawn NBC’s late-nite stars “riding the F train,” for example.)

  31. Tim says:

    Not that I was at all responsible for any of today’s extremely funny and enlightening sock puppetry, but I generally enjoy when puppeteers leave us guessing as to their identities. I’ve taken to leaving my email address the same, though, so if anyone takes real offense, TGW’s administrators can track me down and reprimand me.

    Are you suggesting a policy change, Dave? Should it be treif, perhaps, to cloak completely?

    Also, I thought the term was “the D train”.

  32. Tim says:

    Close italics!

  33. lane says:

    seems like in this case it’s the B train . . .

  34. Holland Cotter says:

    Hey! I thought I was the dicks critic!

  35. lane says:

    Roberta Smith really did get on FB today, it’s so weird that we were joking about that.

    she took over jerry’s comments, it was just like last week at TGW. funny . . .

    and Ken Johnson has been on it for a while.