<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Forever youngish: Why nobody wants to be an adult anymore</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/269/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/269</link>
	<description>The daily organ of the Northeast Corridor Social Club</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 04:32:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Great Whatsit &#187; For now, save my seat on the Flaming Lips&#8217; bandwagon</title>
		<link>http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/269#comment-442</link>
		<dc:creator>The Great Whatsit &#187; For now, save my seat on the Flaming Lips&#8217; bandwagon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 15:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/269#comment-442</guid>
		<description>[...] In a way I suspect that&#8217;s how I&#8217;ll feel about new Flaming Lips albums from here on out, too, though after half a dozen listens to At War with the Mystics in the last couple weeks, I think it&#8217;s better than Yoshimi. Like that one, which my daughters liked more than I did (did someone say something about a disappearing generation gap?), I imagine this album will receive more play around our place over the summer, when late nights with friends turn into early mornings sprawled in recliners on the terrace. It doesn&#8217;t have the orchestral grandeur or self-awareness of its greatness that Soft Bulletin had, but it has just the right dose of lazy, melodic, spaced-out epics to help you drift off to sleep. The songs on Mystics feel more fully realized to me than many of the tracks on Yoshimi did, though I realize a lot of critics are complaining to the contrary. What I like most here are the &#8217;70s sounds, new for this band: the combination of faux-flamenco guitar, mild disco beats, choral backing vocals, and electric flute on &#8220;The Sound of Failure/It&#8217;s Dark &#8230; Is It Always This Dark??,&#8221; my favorite track, which plays like a lethargic echo of Hall and Oates&#8217; &#8220;Say It Isn&#8217;t So.&#8221; It&#8217;s followed seamlessly by &#8220;My Cosmic Autumn Rebellion,&#8221; which could have been a Carpenters tune. The anti-Bush single, &#8220;The W.A.N.D. (The Will Always Negates Defeat),&#8221; builds on fuzzed-out hard rock guitars and handclaps. Imagine Bacharach attempting an arrangement of Kilroy Was Here and you&#8217;ll approximate where this record&#8217;s aiming. Thinking of Mystics as a return to &#8217;70s AOR is, I think, essential to getting it: it&#8217;s structured to have Sides A and B, the whisper and pop of a turntable&#8217;s needle, and I&#8217;m willing to bet the break between sides comes right before the space-prog-jam &#8220;The Wizard Turns On.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In a way I suspect that&#8217;s how I&#8217;ll feel about new Flaming Lips albums from here on out, too, though after half a dozen listens to At War with the Mystics in the last couple weeks, I think it&#8217;s better than Yoshimi. Like that one, which my daughters liked more than I did (did someone say something about a disappearing generation gap?), I imagine this album will receive more play around our place over the summer, when late nights with friends turn into early mornings sprawled in recliners on the terrace. It doesn&#8217;t have the orchestral grandeur or self-awareness of its greatness that Soft Bulletin had, but it has just the right dose of lazy, melodic, spaced-out epics to help you drift off to sleep. The songs on Mystics feel more fully realized to me than many of the tracks on Yoshimi did, though I realize a lot of critics are complaining to the contrary. What I like most here are the &#8217;70s sounds, new for this band: the combination of faux-flamenco guitar, mild disco beats, choral backing vocals, and electric flute on &#8220;The Sound of Failure/It&#8217;s Dark &#8230; Is It Always This Dark??,&#8221; my favorite track, which plays like a lethargic echo of Hall and Oates&#8217; &#8220;Say It Isn&#8217;t So.&#8221; It&#8217;s followed seamlessly by &#8220;My Cosmic Autumn Rebellion,&#8221; which could have been a Carpenters tune. The anti-Bush single, &#8220;The W.A.N.D. (The Will Always Negates Defeat),&#8221; builds on fuzzed-out hard rock guitars and handclaps. Imagine Bacharach attempting an arrangement of Kilroy Was Here and you&#8217;ll approximate where this record&#8217;s aiming. Thinking of Mystics as a return to &#8217;70s AOR is, I think, essential to getting it: it&#8217;s structured to have Sides A and B, the whisper and pop of a turntable&#8217;s needle, and I&#8217;m willing to bet the break between sides comes right before the space-prog-jam &#8220;The Wizard Turns On.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Waterman</title>
		<link>http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/269#comment-435</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Waterman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Apr 2006 00:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/269#comment-435</guid>
		<description>ahem ... i&#039;ve borrowed your winter coat. and it zips on the wrong side.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ahem &#8230; i&#8217;ve borrowed your winter coat. and it zips on the wrong side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bacon</title>
		<link>http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/269#comment-434</link>
		<dc:creator>bacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2006 23:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/269#comment-434</guid>
		<description>Waterman, I admire your defiance. 

A friend told me once he wanted to buy a Miata. I said &quot;you realize that&#039;s a chick car&quot;. &quot;I don&#039;t care...I should be able to drive whatever I want&quot;. My response...&quot;I agree, and I admire your defiance....as long as you still realize you&#039;ll be driving around in a chick car&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Waterman, I admire your defiance. </p>
<p>A friend told me once he wanted to buy a Miata. I said &#8220;you realize that&#8217;s a chick car&#8221;. &#8220;I don&#8217;t care&#8230;I should be able to drive whatever I want&#8221;. My response&#8230;&#8221;I agree, and I admire your defiance&#8230;.as long as you still realize you&#8217;ll be driving around in a chick car&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa Parrish</title>
		<link>http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/269#comment-433</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Parrish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2006 23:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/269#comment-433</guid>
		<description>Hoodie-phobe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hoodie-phobe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bacon</title>
		<link>http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/269#comment-431</link>
		<dc:creator>bacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2006 23:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/269#comment-431</guid>
		<description>Parrish. My soul may wear a hoodie, but my body does not. That is precisely the point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Parrish. My soul may wear a hoodie, but my body does not. That is precisely the point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.120 seconds -->

