<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The most important thing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/2368/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/2368</link>
	<description>The daily organ of the Northeast Corridor Social Club</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 04:32:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Modesto Kid</title>
		<link>http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/2368#comment-55395</link>
		<dc:creator>The Modesto Kid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 23:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greatwhatsit.com/?p=2368#comment-55395</guid>
		<description>Hilarious, thanks for linking it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hilarious, thanks for linking it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Waterman</title>
		<link>http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/2368#comment-55392</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Waterman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 21:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greatwhatsit.com/?p=2368#comment-55392</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://edgeofthewest.wordpress.com/2008/05/01/fox-cant-spell-douglas-or-douglass/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;I had to find someplace to link to this.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://edgeofthewest.wordpress.com/2008/05/01/fox-cant-spell-douglas-or-douglass/" rel="nofollow">I had to find someplace to link to this.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lane</title>
		<link>http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/2368#comment-55350</link>
		<dc:creator>lane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 16:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greatwhatsit.com/?p=2368#comment-55350</guid>
		<description>well and let me put this out there.  

Public Enemy.

&quot;If white people knew what was going on in most black people&#039;s heads it would scare the shit out of them&quot; - miles davis

talk about performers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well and let me put this out there.  </p>
<p>Public Enemy.</p>
<p>&#8220;If white people knew what was going on in most black people&#8217;s heads it would scare the shit out of them&#8221; &#8211; miles davis</p>
<p>talk about performers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brooke</title>
		<link>http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/2368#comment-55349</link>
		<dc:creator>brooke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 16:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greatwhatsit.com/?p=2368#comment-55349</guid>
		<description>Sorry LT, that wasn&#039;t the authentic me talking.  I think we can all squarely place blame on PD.  SSW, I agree with your sentiments overall, particularly in the final paragraph.  

The reference to sampling touches on authenticity from another angle, one that&#039;s germane not only to politics, but to art and music and, really, living in the modern world,  I gather that&#039;s Dave&#039;s take from the start, but I&#039;m occasionally slow on the up take.  

Maybe this gets to the heart of my perspective - I don&#039;t think sampling or borrowing from other sources necessarily detracts from authenticity.  Take a track from Public Enemy&#039;s seminal &quot;It Takes a Nation of Millions&quot; album.  The song &lt;em&gt;Night of the Living Baseheads&lt;/em&gt; has no fewer than 17 samples (an interesting aside that this song would be financially unfeasible today due to licensing rules), and I don&#039;t think anyone could argue that&#039;s not an original contribution to the genre.  Likewise, the album &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.socialush.com/?p=70&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Rainy Dayz&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, by Amp Live, is a (seriously badass) remix of Radiohead&#039;s &lt;em&gt;In Rainbows&lt;/em&gt; .  Again, authentic even though it&#039;s thoroughly derivative.  

Anyway, I&#039;m done kicking this dead horse.  But I really enjoyed the post and the discussion that followed!  Great food for thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry LT, that wasn&#8217;t the authentic me talking.  I think we can all squarely place blame on PD.  SSW, I agree with your sentiments overall, particularly in the final paragraph.  </p>
<p>The reference to sampling touches on authenticity from another angle, one that&#8217;s germane not only to politics, but to art and music and, really, living in the modern world,  I gather that&#8217;s Dave&#8217;s take from the start, but I&#8217;m occasionally slow on the up take.  </p>
<p>Maybe this gets to the heart of my perspective &#8211; I don&#8217;t think sampling or borrowing from other sources necessarily detracts from authenticity.  Take a track from Public Enemy&#8217;s seminal &#8220;It Takes a Nation of Millions&#8221; album.  The song <em>Night of the Living Baseheads</em> has no fewer than 17 samples (an interesting aside that this song would be financially unfeasible today due to licensing rules), and I don&#8217;t think anyone could argue that&#8217;s not an original contribution to the genre.  Likewise, the album <a href="http://blog.socialush.com/?p=70" rel="nofollow"><em>Rainy Dayz</em></a>, by Amp Live, is a (seriously badass) remix of Radiohead&#8217;s <em>In Rainbows</em> .  Again, authentic even though it&#8217;s thoroughly derivative.  </p>
<p>Anyway, I&#8217;m done kicking this dead horse.  But I really enjoyed the post and the discussion that followed!  Great food for thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lane</title>
		<link>http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/2368#comment-55347</link>
		<dc:creator>lane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 15:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greatwhatsit.com/?p=2368#comment-55347</guid>
		<description>&quot;It’s sad to me that many people choose just to ‘live with’ a great deal of internal conflict that complicates many areas of their life, but if they ever found the bridge to invest more energy in listening to what they need/want/feel, they’d probably see some very positive shifts in their well-being and may even be able to share this with the external world in ways they never imagined possible.&quot;

I think this is a lovely idea ssw, unfortunately, we all have wants/needs and feelings that conflict.  everyone does.  finding that inner self, and facing it, requires looking at what those things bring and the choices we make.  But I think this is where Dave&#039;s post gets at the dangerous part of everyone&#039;s psyche, with awareness come the awareness of performance.

&quot;Many of us can and do tap into “who we really are” and the likelihood of finding it rises exponentially with safety–when a person finds a source of real safety (if they can) I think sincerity, earnestness, authenticity, etc surface.&quot;

this is completely true, not everyone finds this source,  i&#039;ll always be grateful for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It’s sad to me that many people choose just to ‘live with’ a great deal of internal conflict that complicates many areas of their life, but if they ever found the bridge to invest more energy in listening to what they need/want/feel, they’d probably see some very positive shifts in their well-being and may even be able to share this with the external world in ways they never imagined possible.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think this is a lovely idea ssw, unfortunately, we all have wants/needs and feelings that conflict.  everyone does.  finding that inner self, and facing it, requires looking at what those things bring and the choices we make.  But I think this is where Dave&#8217;s post gets at the dangerous part of everyone&#8217;s psyche, with awareness come the awareness of performance.</p>
<p>&#8220;Many of us can and do tap into “who we really are” and the likelihood of finding it rises exponentially with safety–when a person finds a source of real safety (if they can) I think sincerity, earnestness, authenticity, etc surface.&#8221;</p>
<p>this is completely true, not everyone finds this source,  i&#8217;ll always be grateful for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.111 seconds -->

