Comments on: Overheard in LA http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/2125 The daily organ of the Northeast Corridor Social Club Sat, 11 Feb 2012 04:32:57 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: S and S http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/2125#comment-53833 S and S Wed, 13 Feb 2008 02:43:41 +0000 http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/2125#comment-53833 Overheard at our house: "Hooray for Obama!" Overheard at our house: “Hooray for Obama!”

]]> By: Bryan Waterman http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/2125#comment-53832 Bryan Waterman Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:30:57 +0000 http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/2125#comment-53832 I bet Burke Wong googles this comments thread someday. Hi, Burke! I bet Burke Wong googles this comments thread someday. Hi, Burke!

]]> By: Tim Wager http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/2125#comment-53830 Tim Wager Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:21:23 +0000 http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/2125#comment-53830 I bet <a href="http://www.leadcommander.com/hkis/reunion/2004/Patrick_07_04/DSC_0113.jpg" rel="nofollow">Burke Wong</a> hears that he looks like the <i>Entourage</i> guy all the time. I bet Burke Wong hears that he looks like the Entourage guy all the time.

]]> By: LP http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/2125#comment-53829 LP Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:02:43 +0000 http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/2125#comment-53829 Woops! You're not wrong, I am. That's the Entourage guy, not Burke Wong. He just really looks like him. Ha. Woops! You’re not wrong, I am. That’s the Entourage guy, not Burke Wong.

He just really looks like him. Ha.

]]> By: bryan http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/2125#comment-53828 bryan Tue, 12 Feb 2008 20:29:34 +0000 http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/2125#comment-53828 re: #9 and #1 -- oh, wait, did i get it wrong? i thought burke wong was the softball guy. he's the entourage guy? what the @!$% do i know, indeed. maybe they're alternate dimension doubles. re: #9 and #1 — oh, wait, did i get it wrong? i thought burke wong was the softball guy. he’s the entourage guy? what the @!$% do i know, indeed. maybe they’re alternate dimension doubles.

]]>