Comments on: The garland briefer than a girl’s, part 1

By: Bryan Waterman

Bryan Waterman — Thu, 25 Oct 2007 04:43:49 +0000

d’oh! why didn’t i think of that!

i mean … imagine away!

By: stephanie sportshater

stephanie sportshater — Thu, 25 Oct 2007 04:36:43 +0000

and bryan–um, no, i don’t? i mean, they’re not at all jocky *or * D&Dish? dang, hard to be convincing here . . .

and by the way, when you were staying at our house (which must have given you the full view of the closet, gazing in from the bed), i hope you freely availed yourself of the wardrobe. i’d like to imagine a week-long dress-up party. if not, it’s time to come back and remedy that.

By: stephanie sportshater

stephanie sportshater — Thu, 25 Oct 2007 04:32:18 +0000

oops. what tim said.

By: Bryan Waterman

Bryan Waterman — Thu, 25 Oct 2007 04:27:48 +0000

#24 — do you have something against civil war reenactors?

“steffswhitesuit” will always mean swells’s well-stocked closets to me.

By: Bryan Waterman

Bryan Waterman — Thu, 25 Oct 2007 04:25:40 +0000

at least i got the hughes part right …