<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Housekeeping</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/1730/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/1730</link>
	<description>The daily organ of the Northeast Corridor Social Club</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 06:44:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PB</title>
		<link>http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/1730#comment-50113</link>
		<dc:creator>PB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 01:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/1730#comment-50113</guid>
		<description>Stella, you are so pretty and smart and kind and really that hat is the best.
xoxxo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stella, you are so pretty and smart and kind and really that hat is the best.<br />
xoxxo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stella</title>
		<link>http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/1730#comment-50082</link>
		<dc:creator>Stella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 01:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/1730#comment-50082</guid>
		<description>There is some small irony in the idea of trying to direct or limit people&#039;s comments, particularly when one post later Scott so eloquently analyzed web 2.0 as the empowering of the people over the producers.

And yes, I confess I am entirely driven by the desire for positive feedback.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is some small irony in the idea of trying to direct or limit people&#8217;s comments, particularly when one post later Scott so eloquently analyzed web 2.0 as the empowering of the people over the producers.</p>
<p>And yes, I confess I am entirely driven by the desire for positive feedback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/1730#comment-50079</link>
		<dc:creator>Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 00:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/1730#comment-50079</guid>
		<description>Grrr. I hate that I missed out on the bulk of this conversation, chiming in late and all. I&#039;d just like to say that, as a lurker, I really enjoy the format as is. Perhaps Thursdays could switch off between playlists and short reviews? I&#039;ll shamelessly admit that I enjoyed contributing a the playlist so those should stay, but the short reviews are missed as well. 

34: Please, no lurker awards; my fragile ego won&#039;t be able to handle it! I&#039;ll have devastating flashbacks to junior high when I wasn&#039;t nominated for any of those end of the year awards when Marleyfan wins Most Irresistable.

I also like Stephanie&#039;s &quot;Tales from the Office&quot; suggestion. Other than that, I have to agree with Tim in #17. Perfectly stated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grrr. I hate that I missed out on the bulk of this conversation, chiming in late and all. I&#8217;d just like to say that, as a lurker, I really enjoy the format as is. Perhaps Thursdays could switch off between playlists and short reviews? I&#8217;ll shamelessly admit that I enjoyed contributing a the playlist so those should stay, but the short reviews are missed as well. </p>
<p>34: Please, no lurker awards; my fragile ego won&#8217;t be able to handle it! I&#8217;ll have devastating flashbacks to junior high when I wasn&#8217;t nominated for any of those end of the year awards when Marleyfan wins Most Irresistable.</p>
<p>I also like Stephanie&#8217;s &#8220;Tales from the Office&#8221; suggestion. Other than that, I have to agree with Tim in #17. Perfectly stated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate The Great</title>
		<link>http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/1730#comment-50071</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate The Great</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 21:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/1730#comment-50071</guid>
		<description>I agree with 19. 

As far as my lurkiness goes: Hi. I&#039;m Kate. I&#039;m Lane and Adriana&#039;s niece. I live in Utah right now, but I&#039;m from Albuquerque, so Dave, I&#039;m your biggest supporter when you relate to us about your &#039;Burque background.  A tiny bit of that boom of publicity comes from my links to select posts, though I occupy a tiny bit of the Internet world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with 19. </p>
<p>As far as my lurkiness goes: Hi. I&#8217;m Kate. I&#8217;m Lane and Adriana&#8217;s niece. I live in Utah right now, but I&#8217;m from Albuquerque, so Dave, I&#8217;m your biggest supporter when you relate to us about your &#8216;Burque background.  A tiny bit of that boom of publicity comes from my links to select posts, though I occupy a tiny bit of the Internet world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Waterman</title>
		<link>http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/1730#comment-50038</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Waterman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 21:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/1730#comment-50038</guid>
		<description>I meant earlier to respond to Missy&#039;s comment up in #11:

&lt;em&gt;I’ve been so impressed with the writerly-ness of posts here at TGW that I’ve almost completely stopped blogging on my blog.&lt;/em&gt;

This really makes me sad, in a way, a) because I love reading Margo, Darling -- both for your smartness and literariness and because I miss being in closer, more routine contact with you and b) because I would hate to see personal blogs replaced by more &quot;literary&quot; blogs altogether. i love reading updates from several friends and family members on their lives. sometimes they push toward polished essays, sometimes not, but i like the genre and like reading stuff from my friends who do it well. i feel like most of my stuff here is less polished or substantial than a lot of what my friends write on their supposedly non-literary blogs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant earlier to respond to Missy&#8217;s comment up in #11:</p>
<p><em>I’ve been so impressed with the writerly-ness of posts here at TGW that I’ve almost completely stopped blogging on my blog.</em></p>
<p>This really makes me sad, in a way, a) because I love reading Margo, Darling &#8212; both for your smartness and literariness and because I miss being in closer, more routine contact with you and b) because I would hate to see personal blogs replaced by more &#8220;literary&#8221; blogs altogether. i love reading updates from several friends and family members on their lives. sometimes they push toward polished essays, sometimes not, but i like the genre and like reading stuff from my friends who do it well. i feel like most of my stuff here is less polished or substantial than a lot of what my friends write on their supposedly non-literary blogs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.107 seconds -->
