<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jean Baudrillard: He&#8217;s &#8220;real&#8221; dead</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/1356/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/1356</link>
	<description>The daily organ of the Northeast Corridor Social Club</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 04:32:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lisa t.</title>
		<link>http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/1356#comment-30461</link>
		<dc:creator>lisa t.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 15:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/1356#comment-30461</guid>
		<description>thanks, scotty.  you comfort me.  this logic is something like, &quot;since we&#039;re not dead yet, let&#039;s go to the beach!&quot;

it &lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt; a nice day today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks, scotty.  you comfort me.  this logic is something like, &#8220;since we&#8217;re not dead yet, let&#8217;s go to the beach!&#8221;</p>
<p>it <em>is</em> a nice day today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scotty</title>
		<link>http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/1356#comment-30053</link>
		<dc:creator>Scotty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 01:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/1356#comment-30053</guid>
		<description>Lisa, be not dismayed.  Think of Baudrillard’s brand of postmodernism as similar to the knowledge that the sun will one day expand and engulf the earth before contracting and becoming a white dwarf: the stuff is interesting and important to ponder, but as information goes, it is inconsequential.

Perhaps you&#039;d be comforted by the man’s own words: &lt;em&gt;I ask of Americans only that they be Americans.  I do not ask them to be intelligent, sensible, original.  I ask them only to populate a space incommensurate with my own...this is the only country which gives you the opportunity to be so brutally naive: things, faces, skies, and deserts are expected to be simply what they are.  This is the land of &#039;just as it is.&#039;&lt;/em&gt;

We believe that the sun will engulf the earth, so it will.  This doesn’t change our behavior, or make us see the sun as a force of evil.  It is just the sun, that thing that makes nice days nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lisa, be not dismayed.  Think of Baudrillard’s brand of postmodernism as similar to the knowledge that the sun will one day expand and engulf the earth before contracting and becoming a white dwarf: the stuff is interesting and important to ponder, but as information goes, it is inconsequential.</p>
<p>Perhaps you&#8217;d be comforted by the man’s own words: <em>I ask of Americans only that they be Americans.  I do not ask them to be intelligent, sensible, original.  I ask them only to populate a space incommensurate with my own&#8230;this is the only country which gives you the opportunity to be so brutally naive: things, faces, skies, and deserts are expected to be simply what they are.  This is the land of &#8216;just as it is.&#8217;</em></p>
<p>We believe that the sun will engulf the earth, so it will.  This doesn’t change our behavior, or make us see the sun as a force of evil.  It is just the sun, that thing that makes nice days nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruben Mancillas</title>
		<link>http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/1356#comment-30025</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruben Mancillas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 23:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/1356#comment-30025</guid>
		<description>This post, and Dave&#039;s &quot; Respecting believers&quot;, got me to thinking about the routine on an old Steve Martin album.

&quot;What if you died and went to...heaven?

If there were clouds and angels with wings?

Wouldn&#039;t you feel &lt;em&gt; stupid&lt;/em&gt;?

In college they said this was all bullshit&quot;

Great post Scott, but my sense of French poststructuralist rigor is crying out for a complete band specific album/book list.  You pulled a fast one by mixing and matching like that.  Does Jean have a &lt;em&gt; Please Please Me&lt;/em&gt; , &lt;em&gt; Wish You Were Here&lt;/em&gt; , or &lt;em&gt; Nebraska&lt;/em&gt;  hiding in his oeuvre?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post, and Dave&#8217;s &#8221; Respecting believers&#8221;, got me to thinking about the routine on an old Steve Martin album.</p>
<p>&#8220;What if you died and went to&#8230;heaven?</p>
<p>If there were clouds and angels with wings?</p>
<p>Wouldn&#8217;t you feel <em> stupid</em>?</p>
<p>In college they said this was all bullshit&#8221;</p>
<p>Great post Scott, but my sense of French poststructuralist rigor is crying out for a complete band specific album/book list.  You pulled a fast one by mixing and matching like that.  Does Jean have a <em> Please Please Me</em> , <em> Wish You Were Here</em> , or <em> Nebraska</em>  hiding in his oeuvre?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lisa t.</title>
		<link>http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/1356#comment-30014</link>
		<dc:creator>lisa t.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 20:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/1356#comment-30014</guid>
		<description>Loved this post.  Don&#039;t love Baudrillard.  Too dismally postmodern/ poststructuralist.

I&#039;ve been doing some academic exploration of the human condition, recurring situations, and the universals that we &quot;recognize&quot; in eachother vs. whether there is only the &lt;em&gt;perception&lt;/em&gt; of recurrence and/or recognition.  I think I know what B. would say...and it seems like with your &quot;kiss&quot; example, I know what you might say too, Scotty.  And yet...

This takes me back to Dave&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/1315&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;More ludicrous than thou&lt;/a&gt; post and the ensuing comments.  If we&#039;re all just part of the &quot;grid&quot; that Trow-via-Rachel points out, what&#039;s the f-ing point??  
The point is that there is no point?  
The fact that I think you&#039;re pretty great is really meaningless or masked?  
Are there or are there not things we &quot;recognize&quot; in each other-- and are those things &quot;real&quot; or only &quot;hyperreal&quot;?

My brain feels like it&#039;s breathing after reading the greatwhatsit.  Thank you.  

On a related note, and for more brain-breathing, have some fun with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.elsewhere.org/pomo&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the postmodern essay generator.&lt;/a&gt;  (This link also provides possible names for your band, if you&#039;re looking.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loved this post.  Don&#8217;t love Baudrillard.  Too dismally postmodern/ poststructuralist.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been doing some academic exploration of the human condition, recurring situations, and the universals that we &#8220;recognize&#8221; in eachother vs. whether there is only the <em>perception</em> of recurrence and/or recognition.  I think I know what B. would say&#8230;and it seems like with your &#8220;kiss&#8221; example, I know what you might say too, Scotty.  And yet&#8230;</p>
<p>This takes me back to Dave&#8217;s <a href="http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/1315" rel="nofollow">More ludicrous than thou</a> post and the ensuing comments.  If we&#8217;re all just part of the &#8220;grid&#8221; that Trow-via-Rachel points out, what&#8217;s the f-ing point??<br />
The point is that there is no point?<br />
The fact that I think you&#8217;re pretty great is really meaningless or masked?<br />
Are there or are there not things we &#8220;recognize&#8221; in each other&#8211; and are those things &#8220;real&#8221; or only &#8220;hyperreal&#8221;?</p>
<p>My brain feels like it&#8217;s breathing after reading the greatwhatsit.  Thank you.  </p>
<p>On a related note, and for more brain-breathing, have some fun with <a href="http://www.elsewhere.org/pomo" rel="nofollow">the postmodern essay generator.</a>  (This link also provides possible names for your band, if you&#8217;re looking.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LP</title>
		<link>http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/1356#comment-30012</link>
		<dc:creator>LP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 20:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/1356#comment-30012</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t read Baudrillard, but Scotty&#039;s referencing of chavez&#039;s and arafat&#039;s actions reminded me of one of my favorite political moments: Khrushchev banging the lectern with his shoe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t read Baudrillard, but Scotty&#8217;s referencing of chavez&#8217;s and arafat&#8217;s actions reminded me of one of my favorite political moments: Khrushchev banging the lectern with his shoe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.113 seconds -->

