<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another break in the schedule: More short reviews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/1019/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/1019</link>
	<description>The daily organ of the Northeast Corridor Social Club</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 04:32:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Great Whatsit &#187; Year in review: The best of TGW 2006</title>
		<link>http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/1019#comment-14689</link>
		<dc:creator>The Great Whatsit &#187; Year in review: The best of TGW 2006</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 14:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/1019#comment-14689</guid>
		<description>[...] Dave B on indoor heating Rachel Berkowitz on The Duke Spirit Lisa Parrish on Norah Vincent, Self-Made Man [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dave B on indoor heating Rachel Berkowitz on The Duke Spirit Lisa Parrish on Norah Vincent, Self-Made Man [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MB</title>
		<link>http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/1019#comment-13539</link>
		<dc:creator>MB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/1019#comment-13539</guid>
		<description>I completely agree with your assessment of The Queen.  The movie far surpassed my expectations.  Three things I find myself thinking about a day after having seen the film: 

1) The inclusions of the stag and stalking--if a little heavy-handed--were also brilliant.  Not only did they prove an interesting metaphor and foil for how the press and royalty treated Diana, their inclusion also called to mind how many times I&#039;ve seen people of the queen&#039;s generation fixate on an object other than the one at hand as a way for them to sort out their grief or confusion.  
2) I appreciate that the filmmaker&#039;s didn&#039;t let Diana steal the show.  The use of news clips and  photos from her life proved to be an uderstated way of recalling her life and also served as a reminder that for most of us, all we knew about her came from the press..
3) The film was also a great reminder about how goodness usually comes in imperfect packages: the calling up of Winston Churchill early on, the tracing of Diana&#039;s tulmultuous life, and the exacting account of the queen&#039;s and Tony Blair&#039;s decisions in the days after Diana&#039;s death, all point to the notion that leadership--and an ability to put goodness into the world--often comes from flawed and imperfect people..
.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree with your assessment of The Queen.  The movie far surpassed my expectations.  Three things I find myself thinking about a day after having seen the film: </p>
<p>1) The inclusions of the stag and stalking&#8211;if a little heavy-handed&#8211;were also brilliant.  Not only did they prove an interesting metaphor and foil for how the press and royalty treated Diana, their inclusion also called to mind how many times I&#8217;ve seen people of the queen&#8217;s generation fixate on an object other than the one at hand as a way for them to sort out their grief or confusion.<br />
2) I appreciate that the filmmaker&#8217;s didn&#8217;t let Diana steal the show.  The use of news clips and  photos from her life proved to be an uderstated way of recalling her life and also served as a reminder that for most of us, all we knew about her came from the press..<br />
3) The film was also a great reminder about how goodness usually comes in imperfect packages: the calling up of Winston Churchill early on, the tracing of Diana&#8217;s tulmultuous life, and the exacting account of the queen&#8217;s and Tony Blair&#8217;s decisions in the days after Diana&#8217;s death, all point to the notion that leadership&#8211;and an ability to put goodness into the world&#8211;often comes from flawed and imperfect people..<br />
.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephanie Wells</title>
		<link>http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/1019#comment-13475</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie Wells</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greatwhatsit.com/archives/1019#comment-13475</guid>
		<description>Dave, that is the best review of all time.  I look forward to the summer version, re:  AC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave, that is the best review of all time.  I look forward to the summer version, re:  AC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.114 seconds -->

